Just curious, is there a fundamental reason you have to oppose this
beyond simply the scale?
It's a cargo cult style extension of a not particularly useful IPv4
convention to IPv6. A much more useful convention that happens to be
easier to implement is that hosts with static addresses have rDNS and
hosts without do not. That would be a lot more useful to all involved.
But again, at M3AAWG, this seems to be a settled topic. Anyone who
expects rDNS for dynamic IPv6 addresses is an outlier.
R's,
John
PS: Have you figured out how to do DNSSEC on dynamically generated reverse
zones, both for results that return PTR and results that return NXDOMAIN?
It's possible but it's not trivial.
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
