> > We're still in the early phases of IPv6. If sufficient ISPs drop PTR > > for dynamic IPv6 addresses, email providers and others who base some > > sort of "reputation" on IPv4 PTRs today will simply have to adapt. > > > Steinar, > > I think this is bigger than anti-spam logic. Simply put: Customers > pay for the Internet. If customers want to "tag" an IPv6 block as > their own as they do with IPv4, why can't they? Please don't > answer me as if I am a peer, answer as if I am a paying customer > asking "why not?"
Customers with *static* IPv6 addresses will certainly be able to get the desired PTR records for their IPv6 addresses. This is the same as for IPv4. The difference for customers with *dynamic* IPv6 addresses is that the size of the IP6 space makes it infeasible to pre-generate PTR recrds, and I see no good reason to dynamically generate these records just because parts of the IPv4 world expects them. > Simply deciding a request is silly (even with peer support) won't > make it go away, it will only make your _problem_ become a source > of _revenue_for_your_competitor_ and eventually putting you behind > what _everyone_else_is_already_doing_. I'll let the market decide. For now, such a requirement isn't even a blip on the horizon as far as I can see. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
