Here’s some suggestions from ISC on capturing information on this memory growth issue:
https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01208 Frank From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Oberman Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 12:07 PM To: Mukund Sivaraman Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: still have named memory leak On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:12 AM, Mukund Sivaraman <m...@isc.org <mailto:m...@isc.org> > wrote: Hi Len On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:52:23AM -0600, lcon...@go2france.com <mailto:lcon...@go2france.com> wrote: > binary upgraded Freebsd 10 to Freebsd 10.1 > > named 9.10.1, compiled from source > > at named start, 305 MB memory > > after several hours of running named is approaching 800 MB. I'm sure after a > couple of days, as before, it will head towards 2000 MB > > suggestions? > > this is a recursive only NS, about 20M q/day restricted by ACL to > "ournetworks" This tells us that the named process size grows large, but more information is needed to discover why. Can you send us the following? 1. Your named configuration. 2. Regular dumps over time of the statistics that are available via HTTP, as the named process grows. See the "statistics-channels" documentation in the manual. You can use curl or wget to dump them to a file. The standard tool for this on FreeBSD is fetch(1). E.g. fetch -o FILE "URL" In a script I usually also use '-q' to eliminate noise, but YMMV. I suspect most systems have wget and/or curl installed, but fetch is always present on FreeBSD. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkober...@gmail.com <mailto:rkober...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
