> Mike Hoskins wrote: > > Do you guys have max-cache-size set? I didn't see it in the borderworlds > named.conf. I've seen similar growth problems when testing 9.x before > setting that (experiment at the time just to see what would happen, and > confirmed this behavior). Set sensible resource limits based on available > resources.
I am going to see what happens with max-cache-size set, but I am convinced that there is a bug in bind. My named has been running for 7.5 weeks now and has been steadily growing in size except for a 1.5 week pause after I did an rndc flush. The process size started out at 36 MB and is now up to 584 MB. But when I do an rndc dumpdb -cache I get a file that is only 5 MB in size. Given the automatic cache cleaning, named should stabilize in size in less than 7.5 weeks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vin?cius Ferr?o <fer...@if.ufrj.br> > Date: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 at 10:17 AM > To: Thomas Schulz <sch...@adi.com> > Cc: "bind-us...@isc.org" <bind-us...@isc.org> > Subject: Re: bind-9.10.0-P2 memory leak? > >>I'm having the exactly same issue. Take a look at my post @ServerFault: >>http://serverfault.com/questions/616752/bind-9-10-constantly-killed-on-fre >>ebsd-10-0-with-out-of-swap-space >> >>Sent from my iPhone >> >>On 09/09/2014, at 11:15, "Thomas Schulz" <sch...@adi.com> wrote: >> >>>> Hello >>>> >>>> I recently upgraded my authoritative nameservers to bind-9.10.0-P2 and >>>> after a while one of them ended up using all its swap and the named >>>> process got killed. The other servers are seeing similar behaviour, >>>>but >>>> I restarted named on all of them to postpone further crashes. >>>> >>>> I am using rate-limiting as well DLZ with PostgreSQL. The server has >>>>two >>>> views. The operating system is FreeBSD 8.4. >>>> >>>> My configuration: >>>> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named.conf >>>> >>>> Log of the memory usage: >>>> http://borderworlds.dk/~xi/named-leak/named-mem-usage.log >>>> >>>> As you can see, in less than a week, named has grown more than 900MB >>>>in >>>> size. >>>> >>>> Is anyone else experiencing something similar? >>>> >>>> If I need to provide more information, I will be happy to do so. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Christian Laursen >>> >>> What version did you upgrade from? I am seeing bind 9.9.5 and 9.9.6 >>> grow without any evidence that it will ever stop. See my mail to this >>> list with the subject "Re: Process size versus cache size." Mine is >>> growing slower than yours, but it is now up to 548 MB. >>> >>> Tom Schulz >>> Applied Dynamics Intl. >>> sch...@adi.com Tom Schulz Applied Dynamics Intl. sch...@adi.com
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
