On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 17:29 +1000, Noel Butler wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 19:33 -0700, Dave Warren wrote: > > > On 3/13/2013 17:11, Noel Butler wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 14:43 -0700, Dave Warren wrote: > > > > > > > I almost wouldn't bother with SPF records these days though, except > > > > that > > > > the code was already written. > > > > > > > > > > # grep SPF maillog |grep -c '\-all' > > > 2438 > > > > > > # grep SPF maillog |grep -c '\~all' > > > 7509 > > > > > > Can you compare that against queries to TXT style SPF records? > > > I'll see what I can do in the morning, its 30 past beer o'clock now > >
20741, so direct SPF RR hits is about one third of those using TXT RR, small, but, insignificant? I wouldn't really say so, but some might. I suspect the SPF wanting to be deprecated is because of the lack of take-up, due to lazy admins, there are some resolvers in use from ancient debian boxes that are so old, they dont understand the SPF RR, yes I know, they have bigger problems than that, but, again, comes down to laziness, DNS is not rocket science, I'm sure given ARM and access to google, a 13yo kid could get at least the "basics" right.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
