Nevermind. I get it now. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. Jeff
On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:21 AM, Jeff Justice <listacco...@starionline.com> wrote: > Hmmm....okay. It makes me wonder why my primary isn't doing this as well > though. They have been running the same version. > > Jeff > > > On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) <micho...@cisco.com> > wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Jeff Justice <listacco...@starionline.com> >> Date: Saturday, August 18, 2012 12:24 AM >> To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org> >> Subject: Mangled secondary records... >> >>> I made a change in all of the master records and wanted to force the >>> slave to update. >>> >>> I deleted all the host files on the secondary and restarted named. >>> >>> It pulls all the domains in and creates new host files, but when you view >>> the host files for each domain, they appear to be garbled. >>> >>> Running the same BIND version on both primary and secondary. >>> >>> Help! Secondary is effectively down as a result... >> >> Are you sure you're not just seeing "compiled" zones that are now default >> in 9.9? >> >> http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.9/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#zonefile_form >> at >> >> http://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.9 >> >> http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.protocols.dns.bind/2012-0 >> 6/msg00094.html >> >> If you really want the old behavior, try your exercise again after adding >> "masterfile-format text;" to your options clause. >> >> This is a FAQ. :-) >> >> > _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
