Hmmm....okay. It makes me wonder why my primary isn't doing this as well though. They have been running the same version.
Jeff On Aug 18, 2012, at 2:53 AM, Michael Hoskins (michoski) <micho...@cisco.com> wrote: > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jeff Justice <listacco...@starionline.com> > Date: Saturday, August 18, 2012 12:24 AM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" <bind-users@lists.isc.org> > Subject: Mangled secondary records... > >> I made a change in all of the master records and wanted to force the >> slave to update. >> >> I deleted all the host files on the secondary and restarted named. >> >> It pulls all the domains in and creates new host files, but when you view >> the host files for each domain, they appear to be garbled. >> >> Running the same BIND version on both primary and secondary. >> >> Help! Secondary is effectively down as a result... > > Are you sure you're not just seeing "compiled" zones that are now default > in 9.9? > > http://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/cur/9.9/doc/arm/Bv9ARM.ch06.html#zonefile_form > at > > http://www.isc.org/software/bind/new-features/9.9 > > http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Comp/comp.protocols.dns.bind/2012-0 > 6/msg00094.html > > If you really want the old behavior, try your exercise again after adding > "masterfile-format text;" to your options clause. > > This is a FAQ. :-) > > _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
