In article <mailman.1260.1341794709.63724.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>,
 Matthew Pounsett <m...@conundrum.com> wrote:

> On 2012/07/08, at 20:40, Doug Barton wrote:
> 
> > On 07/08/2012 17:33, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> >> 
> >> On 2012/07/08, at 20:29, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> >> 
> >>> 
> >>> On 2012/07/08, at 20:26, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> 
> >>>> One can also build named w/o GOST support if one wants.  We statically
> >>>> link all the engines when building named on Windows.
> >>> 
> >>> Unfortunately the port doesn't provide the config hooks to disable GOST 
> >>> support.
> >> 
> >> Actually.. how do you go about doing that anyway?  I was just taking a 
> >> look at writing a patch for the port to allow GOST to be turned off, but 
> >> BIND's configure script doesn't have any information in it about disabling 
> >> individual ciphers.
> > 
> > I wouldn't accept it anyway. For better or worse, GOST is part of the
> > protocol.
> 
> Okay.  
> 
> So to answer my earlier question, what file were you talking about copying 
> into the chroot environment for BIND?

The shared library. When you link dynamically, all the libraries have to 
be in $chroot/usr/lib.

-- 
Barry Margolin
Arlington, MA
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to