On 2012/07/08, at 20:40, Doug Barton wrote: > On 07/08/2012 17:33, Matthew Pounsett wrote: >> >> On 2012/07/08, at 20:29, Matthew Pounsett wrote: >> >>> >>> On 2012/07/08, at 20:26, Mark Andrews wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> One can also build named w/o GOST support if one wants. We statically >>>> link all the engines when building named on Windows. >>> >>> Unfortunately the port doesn't provide the config hooks to disable GOST >>> support. >> >> Actually.. how do you go about doing that anyway? I was just taking a look >> at writing a patch for the port to allow GOST to be turned off, but BIND's >> configure script doesn't have any information in it about disabling >> individual ciphers. > > I wouldn't accept it anyway. For better or worse, GOST is part of the > protocol.
Okay. So to answer my earlier question, what file were you talking about copying into the chroot environment for BIND? _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
