On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Barry Margolin <bar...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the >> otherŠ >> >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.2.1 >> >> Bind 192.168.1.[1-3] to server1 and 192.168.2.1 to server2. >> >> server1 should now get kinda roughly 3 time as much traffic as server2 >> (depending on number of clients, phase of moon, flavor of ice-cream, etc). >> Horrendously icky, waste of space, etc butŠ > > Unless things have changed since I last checked this (many years ago), > BIND ignores the duplicates. > Those aren't duplicates. It's a single server with multiple IP addresses in the desired ratio. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
