On 16/01/12 20:52, Barry Margolin wrote: > In article <mailman.884.1326738053.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, > Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote: > >> On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Barry Margolin wrote: >> >>> In article <mailman.826.1326465946.68562.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, >>> Simon <si...@bk.it.cx> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> sure it is. >>>> >>>> Here a more detailed version: >>>> http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch9/rr.html >>> RR usually results in roughly equal load balancing. He said he wants >>> one of the addresses to get MORE traffic than the other. How do you >>> propose he specify the ratios with BIND? >> One (icky) solution is to hand out more addresses for one server than the >> otherS( >> >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.1 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.2 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.1.3 >> www.example.com IN A 192.168.2.1 >> >> Bind 192.168.1.[1-3] to server1 and 192.168.2.1 to server2. >> >> server1 should now get kinda roughly 3 time as much traffic as server2 >> (depending on number of clients, phase of moon, flavor of ice-cream, etc). >> Horrendously icky, waste of space, etc butS( > Unless things have changed since I last checked this (many years ago), > BIND ignores the duplicates. I see no duplicates here, only one server with 3 IPs. This should work but is a big mess in many ways. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe > from this list > > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- Best regards Sten Carlsen No improvements come from shouting: "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"
_______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users