>> With a static-stub zone (new in BIND 9.8), your server would not prime its >> cache with the bad NS >> rrset from the authoritative server. It would simply start all query >> resolution for the domain in >> question (possibly bigger than the zone) at that server, thus bypassing the >> bad NS rrset.
>Then, what is the different between "static-stub" and "a forwarding zone"? My understanding .. I am sure there are others here who can speak more authoritatively or with more correct terminology, but: A forwarder simply forwards all queries to the indicated servers, and expects an answer back. A stub will tell the resolver "for any zones matching this one, use these nameservers". The resolver will use them like normal NS records, not expecting them to give an answer necessarily (could simply give back a referral). Basically, it's short cutting the delegation process, but that's it, the server still has to do all the work. Cheers, Todd. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
