On Mar 4, 2011, at 5:42 PM, terry wrote:

> 2011/3/5 Chris Buxton <chris.p.bux...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>> On Mar 4, 2011, at 8:46 AM, John Wobus wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Can a zone file a slave in one view and the same zone file
>>> be served by another view?
>> 
>> You can do this for static master zones, but it's not a good idea for slaves.
>> 
>> Depending on the use case for your internal view, you may be able to solve 
>> this better using forwarding, stub zones, or (BIND 9.8 only) static-stub 
>> zones.
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> What's the difference between a stub zone and a static-stub zone?
> I have been thinking they are the same.

With a stub zone, your server would ask the server with bad NS records for the 
NS record set, and would then try to resolve all queries against the zone using 
that NS rrset.

With a static-stub zone (new in BIND 9.8), your server would not prime its 
cache with the bad NS rrset from the authoritative server. It would simply 
start all query resolution for the domain in question (possibly bigger than the 
zone) at that server, thus bypassing the bad NS rrset.

Regards,
Chris Buxton
BlueCat Networks
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to