Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:43:32 -0500
schrieb Peter Laws <pl...@ou.edu>:
> On 06/17/10 08:36, Torsten wrote:
> > Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
> > schrieb Phil Mayers<p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>:
> >
> >> On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
>
> >>> Is it possible to achieve this in a single named.conf, or is it
> >>> recommended to run two instances of bind, each with a different
> >>> listen-on<ip> statement?
> >>
> >> Sure. Use views:
> >>
> >> view authoritative {
> >> recursion no;
> >> match-destinations { mycurrentip; };
> >> zone ...
> >> };
> >>
> >> view authoritative {
> >> recursion yes;
> >> match-destinations { myrecurseip; };
> >> };
> >
> >
> >
> > The important part seems to be "on a secondary IP" and afaik
> > listen-on statements don't work inside of view statements.
>
>
> Why not just have named run on as many interfaces as needed and let
> views sort it out? Views don't need to care which physical interface
> traffic is on.
>
>
>
You're right... I totally forgot about match-destination and
match-recursive-only when I wrote my last message.
Ciao
Torsten
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
