On 06/17/10 08:36, Torsten wrote:
Am Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:35:38 +0100
schrieb Phil Mayers<p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>:
On 17/06/10 12:39, Jørn Skjerven wrote:
Is it possible to achieve this in a single named.conf, or is it
recommended to run two instances of bind, each with a different
listen-on<ip> statement?
Sure. Use views:
view authoritative {
recursion no;
match-destinations { mycurrentip; };
zone ...
};
view authoritative {
recursion yes;
match-destinations { myrecurseip; };
};
The important part seems to be "on a secondary IP" and afaik listen-on
statements don't work inside of view statements.
Why not just have named run on as many interfaces as needed and let views
sort it out? Views don't need to care which physical interface traffic is
on.
--
Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
pl...@ou.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, cra...@ou.edu. Thank you!
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
