Inline reply below -----Original Message----- From: David Forrest [mailto:d...@maple.maplepark.com] Sent: 09 April 2010 9:28 PM To: Doug Barton Cc: Steven Wilmot; bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: CNAME Issue - Whether to use CNAME-data or Response-Flag
>> Doug: I think it is a server error that is being reported because the status is NXDOMAIN instead of the expected NOERROR. >> Could you dig it again @primary-dns.co.uk with +norec and see if your output then shows NOERROR? As suggested in previous replies, it looks as though the problem is with one of the following two possibilites ---- 1 - The original server-configuration (or response) from "primary-dns.co.uk" is NOT VALID If this is the case, could you please help let me know exactly which RFC or configuration that you believe is not valid. Note: 'primary-dns.co.uk is owned and maintained by my ISP (aaisp.net.uk), and I'm fairly certain that they would be quick to implement any "corrections" if you were able to demonstrate a SPECIFIC bug ---- OR: 2 - The response from 'primary-dns.co.uk' is VALID, but the Microsoft-DNS server is not interpreting this properly. If this is the case, then I'm looking for help in identifying exactly which RFC (or other specification) it is not implementing properly. ----- Regards, Steven Wilmot Director Data Utilities Ltd _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
