In message <4bbf91de.2070...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: > On 04/09/10 13:28, David Forrest wrote: > > > > Doug: I think it is a server error that is being reported because > > the status is NXDOMAIN instead of the expected NOERROR. > > Well that's all you really had to say. :) I admit that I didn't catch > the NXDOMAIN bit when I looked at the dig output, I was focused on the > ANSWER and ADDITIONAL sections. > > I'll leave it up to the protocol experts to answer your question, but my > followup question is, what bad thing are you seeing happen because of > this? From your original post it seems like some resolvers are not doing > what BIND 9.6.2-P1 is doing, namely chasing the CNAME to come up with an > answer to the A query. Is that your concern? > > > Could you dig it again @primary-dns.co.uk with +norec and see if your > > output then shows NOERROR? > > Doesn't matter, recursion is not available on the authoritative server > anyway. > > > Doug > > -- > > ... and that's just a little bit of history repeating. > -- Propellerheads > > Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with > a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > bind-users mailing list > bind-users@lists.isc.org > https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
I would be asking operators of primary-dns.co.uk why they are actively cache poisioning. They have not been delegated aaisp.net.uk so they should not be serving aaisp.net.uk. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
