On 02/20/10 08:54, kalpesh varyani wrote:
> Thanks Dave for pointing this out.
>
> the first server did not fail, it behaved as per its configuration.
> But for a stub resolver, which cannot follow referrals, isnt it logical
> for it to detect referrals and move on to the next name server in the list?
No. What you're describing is the function of a resolving name server,
not a stub resolver. If you think that the stub resolver should behave
differently you need to take that up with your OS vendor.
Good luck,
Doug
--
... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
-- Propellerheads
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
