jefsey wrote: > At 11:06 06/12/2009, Chris Buxton wrote: >> On Dec 5, 2009, at 6:34 AM, JFC Morfin wrote: >> > Chris Buxton <cbux...@menandmice.com> 4 décembre 2009 20:29 >> >> The reason IDN support in the BIND query tools (dig, host, >> nslookup) is not the default is because it relies on a 3rd party >> library, which must be installed and configured by the package builder >> beforehand. This is just like SSL support, needed for DNSSEC and TSIG, >> except that most operating systems don't already ship with libidnkit. >> > >> > Do you know the hook? I am just starting investigating the code, and >> I have C only as a minor :-) >> >> All I know is what you find in the BIND source code directory. For >> example, with BIND 9.7.0b2: >> >> $ ./configure --help | grep idn >> --with-idn=MPREFIX enable IDN support using idnkit default PREFIX >> --with-idnlib=ARG specify libidnkit >> >> $ less README.idnkit > > Due to my lack of time and because at the same time I use BIND/Windows > on my XP machine to test my own way to use the DNS in the IDNA suggested > context; I selected 9.5.2. >
Which means spending even more time since BIND/Windows does not yet support the IDN libs. Danny > I understand from quick digging that the IDN libs are of 2003. Since I > mainly want to work on them, I feel this os OK. Except if they have been > updated? > Best. > jfc _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
