On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Martin McCormick <mar...@dc.cis.okstate.edu> wrote a message of 36 lines which said:
> I read that it is best for them all to be the same > version of bind. Strange assertion. > this one needs to be like the rest rather than introducing new > unknowns in to the system. It seems quite backward. Why not upgrading the FreeBSD machines instead? But anyway, there is no point in the whole question: the set of name servers for a domain can be of many versions of BIND and can also include other, completely different, name servers, such as NSD. > Should I be able to find a Debian package of bind9.3.6? Maintained? I doubt it. > The configuration for bind9.3.5 has several > parameters in it that bind9.5 essentially did not understand: > > /etc/bind/named.conf.local:8: unknown option 'allow-query' > /etc/bind/named.conf.local:38: unknown option 'allow-transfer' > /etc/bind/named.conf.local:42: unknown option 'check-names' > /etc/bind/named.conf.local:43: unknown option 'check-names' These parameters certainly still exist in 9.5. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
