On 18.06.09 16:22, Jeffrey Collyer wrote: > M$ has their own take on SPF called Sender ID, which uses a very similar > record - > > "v=spf2.0" rather than "v=spf1" > > so be sure to read up on them both before publishing records for one or > the other.
It has downfalls so I recommend not even studying it, just remember that "spf2" is some M$ crap... v=spf1 is just enough for now. > http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID > > Hotmail in particular is picky about what it rejects and why. Yes, hotmail uses to reject mail for many strange reasons. But I don't recommend playing with spf2 just to get mail to hotmail, I think there are better ways to get your mail anywhere. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. My mind is like a steel trap - rusty and illegal in 37 states. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
