Jeffrey Collyer wrote: > M$ has their own take on SPF called Sender ID, which uses a very similar > record - > > "v=spf2.0" rather than "v=spf1"
To be clear, it's "spf2.0/" plus one of "mfrom", "pra", or "mfrom,pra", e.g., "spf2.0/mfrom" which is essentially the same as regular SPF. > > so be sure to read up on them both before publishing records for one or > the other. SenderID hasn't really caught on mainly because it is of dubious value over regular SPF, particularly PRA and what it's supposed to buy. I wouldn't worry about implementing it... microsoft.com isn't even using it and they invented it. ;-) > > http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID Regards, Mike -- Michael Milligan -> mi...@acmeps.com _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
