On 04.02.09 11:51, Dmitry Rybin wrote: > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > > On 04.02.09 11:23, Dmitry Rybin wrote: > >> It's impossible, :-( over 500'000 client use bind and we must use views > >> to split load on another services. > > > > Named with JINMEI Tatuy patch: > > > max-cache-size 800M; > > > It's way too much, if this applies to all of the 50 views. > > Oh! I decrease memory to 16Mb.
No, I did not write that. Please don't break quoting. > > Pardon? Split load? Do you use views to point different clients to different > > server to lower load on them? > > > > If so, you better should use DNS load balancing or some kind of HW/SW load > > balancer > > > > For first time was DNS load balancing. And after grow clients base we > can use only current scheme. We think about it, but only bind with > current configuration approach to us. Yes, but now it seems to reach its possibilities, so you should better think about changing your architecture... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Quantum mechanics: The dreams stuff is made of. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
