Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: >>> and let me know if it mitigates the problem? > > On 29.01.09 22:50, Dmitry Rybin wrote: >> Oh, great work. I'll try tomorrow.
Named with JINMEI Tatuy patch: max-cache-size 800M; Morning Statistic version: 9.6.0-P1 CPUs found: 8 worker threads: 8 number of zones: 1040 debug level: 0 xfers running: 0 xfers deferred: 0 soa queries in progress: 0 query logging is OFF recursive clients: 167/4900/5000 tcp clients: 0/100 server is up and running Started at Feb 3 00:51 (Now Feb 4 11:15:37) MSK Startup mem: 890M Cur. memory usage: 2534M System limit: 16G ++ Incoming Requests ++ 112510181 QUERY 550 IQUERY 42 STATUS 1043 RESERVED3 101299 NOTIFY 101 UPDATE 14 RESERVED11 ++ Incoming Queries ++ 1929 RESERVED0 75241540 A 2105214 NS 100 CNAME 276292 SOA 2490 WKS 26826476 PTR 2 HINFO 4690581 MX 236619 TXT 24 X25 2003829 AAAA 17 LOC 713837 SRV 46397 NAPTR 58 A6 1022 SPF 4 IXFR 5 AXFR 317561 ANY 23 Others ++ Outgoing Queries ++ >> Yes, I try it. But I can't set ttl to 0. It didn't work. Recursive query >> fails, and authoritative query back to clients with ttl 0 :( > > Yes, that is what "Setting TTL to 0" means. > >> ~50 views, > > can't you really lower the views count? > It's impossible, :-( over 500'000 client use bind and we must use views to split load on another services. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users