Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb-32: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-unequal-lb/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hopefully an easy discuss:

draft-ietf-bess-evpn-per-mcast-flow-df-election is expired, it is normatively
referenced.  What is the plan? [Note:  the other draft which is normatively
referenced has been published as RFC 9785, which will be fixed by the editor,
if not before.]


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Ben Schwartz for their secdir review.



_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to