Hi Ketan, Thank you for the coming update! For the second comment, from section 6.1.1 of RFC9252, ‘When using the Transposition Scheme, the Transposition Length MUST be less than or equal to 24 and less than or equal to the AL.’ If I understand right, the sentence means that the Transposition length can be 24 or less. I am wondering the verification should be yes or no when the transportation length isn’t the same but the label value is. So IMO it may be simpler to limit the transportation length to 24 bits. Best regards, Sandy
Original From:KetanTalaulikar<ketant.i...@gmail.com> To:张征00007940; Cc:rtg-...@ietf.org;bess<bess@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args....@ietf.org; Date:2025-02-27 21:36:43 Subject:Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05 Hi Sandy, Thanks for your review. Please check inline below for responses. On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 6:56 PM Zheng Zhang via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> wrote: Reviewer: Zheng Zhang Review result: Ready Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args/ Document: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05 Reviewer: Zheng (Sandy) Zhang Review Date: Feb 27th, 2025 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: This draft is well written and clear. No issues found. This document is ready for publication. Major issues: None. Nits: None. Comments: The functionality defined in this document also applies to the transposition scheme defined in RFC9252. It might be better to add a reference to RFC9252 Section 4 in the last paragraph of the first section. KT> We also got the very same feedback from the Genart review (https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/l1I-NBJB3XzRe8Z0HLuQWpR7nzY/) and we'll add that in the next update. Since this draft applies to route types 1 and 3, and the associated label is 3 octets, it is appropriate to only apply 24 bits here to the transposition scheme. So it would be best to add a sentence or two to the above. KT> This is already covered by RFC9252 - e.g., https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9252.html#section-6.1.1 ... do let me know if I am missing something. Thanks, Ketan
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
