Hi Sandy, Thanks for your review. Please check inline below for responses.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 6:56 PM Zheng Zhang via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Zheng Zhang > Review result: Ready > > Hello, > > I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args/ > > Document: draft-ietf-bess-bgp-srv6-args-05 > Reviewer: Zheng (Sandy) Zhang > Review Date: Feb 27th, 2025 > Intended Status: Standards Track > > Summary: > This draft is well written and clear. > No issues found. This document is ready for publication. > > Major issues: None. > Nits: None. > > Comments: > The functionality defined in this document also applies to the > transposition > scheme defined in RFC9252. It might be better to add a reference to RFC9252 > Section 4 in the last paragraph of the first section. KT> We also got the very same feedback from the Genart review ( https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/l1I-NBJB3XzRe8Z0HLuQWpR7nzY/) and we'll add that in the next update. > Since this draft applies > to route types 1 and 3, and the associated label is 3 octets, it is > appropriate > to only apply 24 bits here to the transposition scheme. So it would be > best to > add a sentence or two to the above. > KT> This is already covered by RFC9252 - e.g., https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9252.html#section-6.1.1 ... do let me know if I am missing something. Thanks, Ketan
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
