Jeffrey Zhang

We need to discuss the following sections and topics:


  *   Section 3.1.1 - Encapsulation Tunnel - needs error handling in text, 
clear definition of AFI/SAFI + SubTLVs supported

These statements apply to all of the new tunnels definitions:



     *   Define which AFI/SAFIs the tunnel can be associated,
     *   What subTLVs are required to found in the tunnel TLV and which are 
optional,
     *   Are there any interactions between subTLVs (required and optional), and
     *   Error handling.



  *   Section 3.1.2 - Load Balance tunnel - Is only 1 SubTLV allowed or is one 
additional subTLV defined for it.
  *   Section 3.1.3 - draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - has been split 
into 2 documents.  Please change your text.
  *   Section 3.1.4 - The subTLV Receiving MPLS Label Stack needs to have each 
parameters specified.  Each parameter can refer to a previous draft.
  *   Section 3.1.5. - is "sorta" describing a reserved field and "sorta" not.  
Please determine if you want a reserved field.
  *   Section 3.1.6 - see above common questions.
  *   Section 3.1.7 - putting a TEA in another TEA needs to have careful 
definitions of the questions above + plus what TEA can be encapsulated.
  *   Section 3.2 - phrase "The Length field implies the type of the address." 
Is not precise.  Please add a bit here.
  *   Section 3.3 - are you specifying 1 or 2 New Extended Communities in the 
following text.

"The MCAST NACK Extended Community is an MCAST Extended Community with a 
sub-type TBD9 to be assigned by IANA. The MCAST Extended Community is a new 
Extended Community with a type TBD8 to be assigned by IANA."   Do you need an 
IPv4 and IPv6 address support?

  *   Section 3.4 and 3.5- valid ranges for fields in the packet need to be 
added.
  *   Section 3.5 - Are IPv4 and IPv6 address supported?  If so, how do you 
detect each one?

Section 4.3.2 - Paragraph 5, it is not clear how the logic works in bullet 
points 2,3,4

  *   Section 6 -

  1.  Format of IANA pages seems a bit odd.  Do want some of these to be expert 
review?
  2.  Please revise after looking at draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy

Dependencies:

  1.  draft-ietf-idr-rt-derived-community-01 -

Jie Dong did the review for this draft:  See the link below

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/xwNABmb-aRuieDW4BxhyGs0dlic/



  1.  draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - has been split into

draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-05<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi/>
 and 
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-03<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext/>



  1.  draft-ietf-bess-bgp-multicast-08 - (Keyur is a co-author)

The other IDR chairs have not reviewed this draft at this time.   I will give a 
brief review of the draft next week.



Sue Hares



_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to