Hi Jouni, Thanks very much for reviewing. I moved forward the terminology section as you suggested and went through the acronyms.
Version 09 addresses your comments. Thanks! Jorge From: Jouni Korhonen via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org> Date: Thursday, June 6, 2024 at 1:52 PM To: gen-...@ietf.org <gen-...@ietf.org> Cc: bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon....@ietf.org <draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon....@ietf.org> Subject: Genart early review of draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08 CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am an assigned GEN-ART directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mh-split-horizon-08. Summary: Ready with nits Overall I found the document ready for publication. I have not followed the topic thus I abstain myself from technical commentary. Editorial nits: 1) In Section 1.1 Introduction the acronyms are used without a) expanding them on the first use and/or b) before Section 1.2 Conventions and Terminology. Take ES, ESI, AC, BUM, A-D as examples. Expand and/or rearrange sections. 2) Some acronyms are not expanded at all in the document. I admit most are common & known within MPLS etc genres but still.. Take PE as an example. 3) No acronym introduction is Section name (i.e. Section 2.1)
_______________________________________________ BESS mailing list -- bess@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to bess-le...@ietf.org
