> Scenario-1 doesn¹t require any DCI solution and doesn¹t require any interop > to IP-VPN > Scenario-2 requires a DCI solution w/o maintaing an IP-VRF at the GW > Scenario-3 requires a DCI solution that needs an IP-VRF at the GW > Scenario-4 requires inter-op between EVPN and IP-VPN
But this doesn't make sense from a forwarding perspective. What you're really talking about is what type of connectivity is available between the source and destination, not where these devices are located. I don't care if TS1 and TS2 are in the same data center or different ones. What matters is -- - I have layer 2 connectivity with a common control plane - I have layer 2 connectivity with different control planes - I have layer 3 connectivity (and I don't care what sort of layer 3 connectivity it is) Further, the entire idea of "aggregated" versus "not aggregated" is completely mixed up with the concept of a default gateway, and completely ignores the part the host plays in the forwarding process (choosing whether or not to use the default gateway). :-) Russ _______________________________________________ BESS mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
