On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:37:51 +0100, Jenda Krynicky wrote: >> My point is still valid, though; Why do one want to use CGI::Lite >> instead of CGI.pm? Is it better? No.
> Define better. Well. Actually I guess it's a combination of all the other factors I listed. :-) >> Is it safer? No. > Can't say. I guess not. But you can't be safer than safe, can you ;-) With CGI.pm you are sure that millions of other servers are using it, and thereby it's been tested more thoroughly. >> Is it faster? No. > Oh yeah. > See http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=145790 Neither of the benchmarks on that address uses a real-life mod_perl scenario as basis for the testing. -- Tore Aursand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
