From: Tore Aursand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 13:21:15 +0100, Jenda Krynicky wrote: > >> There is absolutely _no_ reason why one shouldn't use the CGI.pm > >> module. > > > There is one. If /s?he/ is using CGI::Lite instead ;-) > > In that case, there are many reasons. There are a lot of CGI::* > modules out there.
Yep, two of them mine. > My point is still valid, though; Why do one want to use CGI::Lite > instead of CGI.pm? Is it better? No. Define better. > Is it safer? No. Can't say. I guess not. But you can't be safer than safe, can you ;-) > Is it faster? No. Oh yeah. See http://www.perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=145790 > Is it more widely used? No. > Does it come with the Perl distribution? No. Jenda ===== [EMAIL PROTECTED] === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz ===== When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed to get drunk and croon as much as they like. -- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
