On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:21:49PM -0800, Jeff Westman wrote:
> Basic question on using '&&' vs 'and'. I see that '&&' has higher precedence
> than 'and', but why does
>
> print 1 && 1 && 0;
> print "\n";
> print 1 and 1 and 0;
> print "\n";
>
> return
> 0
> 1
>
> I would have expected both statements to return 0.
s/return/print/g
Running your program through perl -MO=Deparse,-p gives:
print(0);
print("\n");
((print(1) and 1) and '???');
print("\n");
"and" has very low precedence.
--
Paul Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pjcj.net
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
