Brett W. McCoy wrote: > subroutines. The next question is, why do you *need* to have subroutine > names with dots in them? >
I am using XML::Grove and Data::Grove::Visitor to parse SGML/XML documents; the visitor package generates calls back by element names; unfortunately I face dot-named elements and I MUST parse them by means of identically dot-named subroutines. Thank you all for your suggestions, Jose Luis. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]