Brett W. McCoy wrote:

> subroutines.  The next question is, why do you *need* to have subroutine
> names with dots in them?
>

I am using XML::Grove and Data::Grove::Visitor to parse SGML/XML
documents; the
visitor package generates calls back by element names; unfortunately I
face
dot-named elements  and I MUST parse them by means of identically
dot-named
subroutines.

Thank you all for your suggestions,

Jose Luis.

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to