Great ! I just never used that. so could not gvie the code.
Wel coming your question Why we need to put dot in name ?
Well only "_brian_d_foy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" can answer that , as he/she has
posted the question.
with regards
Rajeev Rumale
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brett W. McCoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Rajeev Rumale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "José Luis Sancho" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: Re: dot-named sub
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Rajeev Rumale wrote:
>
> > Well I have a way around. I have not done this but sure will work. may
be
> > gurus and give a code for this.
> >
> > If we cannot use dot in a sub routine name, but surely can use as a
alias.
> >
> > All we need to do is to have an hash table and assing the functional as
the
> > value to the key which "can" have a "dot"
> >
> > Applogies in advance if I am worng, I just could not resist taking
chances.
>
> You mean if you do something like:
>
> my %subs;
>
> $subs{'www.com'} = sub { .. }
>
> Yes, then you can use dots, in the hash keys that dereference to anonymous
> subroutines. The next question is, why do you *need* to have subroutine
> names with dots in them?
>
> -- Brett
> http://www.chapelperilous.net/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> You need more time; and you probably always will.
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
