On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yikes. If you're going to that, you're better off creating a Perl module
> > and using that in your script. 'do' is better for including subroutines
> > and symbols from another file, since the file is eval'd, for all intents
> > and purposes, in the calling script.
>
> I generally agree. But if you have a perl script that is not a module, I have
> found "do" to be very useful in certain circumstances.
How does its execution differ from using system or forking?
-- Brett
http://www.chapelperilous.net/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A woman may very well form a friendship with a man, but for this to endure,
it must be assisted by a little physical antipathy.
-- Nietzsche
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
