On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Michael D. Risser wrote: > I tend to read about the first 1/4 - 1/2 of a programming book to get the > basics down, after that it becomes a reference for me. "How do I do this > thing?" > > I don't think I have ever read cover to cover, though I probably would get a > much better understanding if I did (Hmmmm have to try to remember to do > that...) I am the same for most reference books, except for a few like "Programming Perl" which I read cover to cover because it was an enjoyable experience. Books like that are similar to having a friend teaching you something and talking to you verses being taught at in a big classroom. Most of the Perl books I have read read well like that, must be something in the water. -- Ian
- arrays and formatting steve
- Re: arrays and formatting Ondrej Par
- Re: arrays and formatting Jos I. Boumans
- Re: arrays and formatting Jos I. Boumans
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Scott Thompson
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech)
- Re: Reading versus Referencing Books ehughes
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Scott Thompson
- Re: Reading versus Referencing Book... Michael D . Risser
- Re: Reading versus Referencing ... iansmith
- Re: Reading versus Referencing ... Peter Scott
- Re: Reading versus Referen... Michael D . Risser
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Sally
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech)
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Scott Thompson
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Yacketta, Ronald
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books Webster, Murray
- RE: Reading versus Referencing Books John Edwards