Sean Davis wrote:
It seems like the "table" version seems to work on many
browsers--is the [envisioned] CSS solution also generally
compatible across browsers these days? It seems that browser
layout engines are still suboptimal for some particulars of CSS.
It depends on what you mean by "these days". A couple of years ago, I
took pains to make the output from a CGI script XHTML compliant and
still rendered as intended in Netscape 4.x, and that was *not* easy...
NS 4 left aside, my impression is that Netscape 6/7, Mozilla, Opera,
IE etc. understand CSS good enough to abandon tables for content
positioning on HTML pages.
But you would be better off if you asked that question in a forum for
HTML.
--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Email: http://www.gunnar.cc/cgi-bin/contact.pl
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<http://learn.perl.org/> <http://learn.perl.org/first-response>
