I haven't find any limitation when printing the HTML text directly with print <<eoh; .... eoh
I find it more easy than using CGI.pm for this task. Teddy, Teddy's Center: http://teddy.fcc.ro/ Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Hughes, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:11 AM Subject: cgi.pm generate html vs. print <<EndOfHTML; I have to say that as a relative beginner, I have really noticed that using cgi.pm to generate forms and entire web pages is a more than a little time consuming. In the interest of time, I have been using "print <<EndOfHTML;" to print the html code (esp. forms) in my programs. There are limitations to this approach as well. The major one that I run into problems with is error-checking. I have not attempted to use html::Template or html::Mason yet, but I think that it is my next step. Can anyone tell me the limitations of using print <<EndOfHTML; to print my html vs. cgi.pm? Also, does anyone have any strong feelings (know of tutorials) toward an altrnative method like html::template or html::mason? Any and all suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks, Andrew -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
