>>>>> "Mo" == Mo Holkar / UKG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mo> CGI Programming (why does no-one call it 'the Mouse book'?) is a very Mo> fine book, but in the edition I have it doesn't discuss using the Mo> CGI.pm module, instead recommending cgi-lib.pl and saying rather Mo> briskly 'for simple scripts, it is far easier and quicker to roll your Mo> own'. Has this policy been changed in more recent editions? Yes, we at Stonehenge dis-recommended the first mouse. But the second mouse is very purchaseable, and uses modern techniques. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/> Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Mel Matsuoka
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Chris Hedemark
- RE: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Kris Cook
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Mark Bergeron
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Geraint Jones
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should ... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Brent Michalski
- Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... Mo Holkar / UKG
- Re: Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what sho... Randal L. Schwartz
- Re: Re: If I could get just one Perl Book what should i... Mark Bergeron
- RE: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... RTaylor
- RE: If I could get just one Perl Book what should it be... RTaylor