On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 01:53:19AM -0400, Martin Blais wrote: > - rewriting bean-web to be a dumber, more generic web interface that > basically renders SQL queries (using the new query engine) without any > special treatment (just tables and tree-tables)
Given Fava does that too, and also provides useful reporting out of the box, would it be worth to have another implementation of the same "web based bean-query console" thing? (Maybe yes, if, say, you consider that Fava has too many additional dependencies. Asking just to understand which design constraints you're considering.) -- Stefano Zacchiroli . z...@upsilon.cc . upsilon.cc/zack . . o . . . o . o Computer Science Professor . CTO Software Heritage . . . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader & OSI Board Director . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club » -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Beancount" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beancount+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to beancount@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beancount/20180401181026.GA3999%40upsilon.cc. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
