Maybe you can't buy a ready build board, but Octavio offers design files for the Red with the C-SIP version of OSD335x ->link <https://octavosystems.com/files/osd3358-sm-red-c-sip-eagle-files/>
acheesehead schrieb am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2021 um 15:42:56 UTC+1: > The board is loosely based upon the Red board. Added a second Ethernet. > The Red is a good starting point. I have a Red that we used to evaluate. I > also have a Blue. Not a bad board, but uses funky connectors. I do not know > of a dev board based upon the cSIP. > > On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 7:38:24 AM UTC-7 acheesehead wrote: > >> Sorry. Can't share our design. Proprietary. No thermal issues as of yet, >> but we are not running intensive software. I do plan on inspecting using a >> thermal camera in real time sometime soon. >> >> On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 at 3:56:29 PM UTC-7 frank....@me.com wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> Are you able to share the high level design of the board. How do you >>> deal with the heat issue >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> frank >>> >>> On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 1:47:39 AM UTC+11 acheesehead wrote: >>> >>>> We have designed a board based upon the Octavo Systems cSIP, which is a >>>> step beyond the SIP. They added eMMC, EEPROM and a MEMS oscillator. Many >>>> layout issues go away using their solution. I have worked extensively with >>>> the Octavo folks. Very nice people. What I understand is that the company >>>> was founded by ex-TI people. They provide free design review services that >>>> uncovered problems with our design. They say they will manage obsolescence >>>> of the components inside of the cSIP. >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, January 26, 2021 at 6:18:24 AM UTC-7 hel...@deepsoft.com >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> At Tue, 26 Jan 2021 05:07:26 -0800 (PST) beagl...@googlegroups.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Thank you Robert! >>>>> > >>>>> > I forgot to mention that I'm looking at the BBW, but I think your >>>>> answer >>>>> > refers to this one as well. >>>>> > What about the availability between both solutions? My intended >>>>> development >>>>> > should be for industry, where they expect very very long product >>>>> > availability. Would a SIP be better over single components, or does >>>>> Octavio >>>>> > face the same problems when any part gets end of life status? >>>>> >>>>> I don't really know. You'll have to talk to the people at TI about >>>>> that. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > Is the image really completely the same? No diff config in uboot or >>>>> > somewhere else? Not easy to compare, because the pinout for both ICs >>>>> is >>>>> > different. >>>>> >>>>> The stock Beagle image works without mods on either. I don't know if >>>>> there is >>>>> a difference in the boot loader or if the uboot srcript in the chip >>>>> EEPPROM is >>>>> different. If there is, there is suitable firmware included on the >>>>> image. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > hel...@deepsoft.com schrieb am Dienstag, 26. Januar 2021 um >>>>> 13:54:41 UTC+1: >>>>> > >>>>> > > At Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:15:36 -0800 (PST) beagl...@googlegroups.com >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Hello everybody, >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > I'm searching the right hardware for an embedded project. One of >>>>> the >>>>> > > Beagle >>>>> > > > variants is likely to be the right base to start with. Some >>>>> point I >>>>> > > > couldn't figure out: >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Why are some boards using the TI AM335x like BBB and others use >>>>> the same >>>>> > > > core, but wrapped in a Octavio SIP. I know that it already >>>>> contains a >>>>> > > bunch >>>>> > > > of components board designers place next to the AM335x. But what >>>>> are the >>>>> > > > main reasons to choose one or the other? Price? Design >>>>> complexity? Is it >>>>> > > > fully software compatible on image level? >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The PocketBeagle uses the Octavio SIP and the Debian images for >>>>> the BBB >>>>> > > work >>>>> > > just fine on the PocketBeagle, with no compatiblity issues. I >>>>> think the >>>>> > > Octavio SIP allows for a more compact board because all of the >>>>> support >>>>> > > components are incorporated into a single package. This makes for >>>>> a >>>>> > > smaller >>>>> > > (and cheaper) PCB. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > -- >>>>> > > Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 <(413)%20658-7953> >>>>> <(413)%20658-7953> GV: 978-633-5364 <(978)%20633-5364> >>>>> > > <(978)%20633-5364> >>>>> > > Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services >>>>> > > http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services >>>>> > > hel...@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Robert Heller -- Cell: 413-658-7953 <(413)%20658-7953> GV: >>>>> 978-633-5364 <(978)%20633-5364> >>>>> Deepwoods Software -- Custom Software Services >>>>> http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Linux Administration Services >>>>> hel...@deepsoft.com -- Webhosting Services >>>>> >>>>> -- For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to beagleboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/beagleboard/75ec98eb-be5f-4d9e-adc4-91b1db3e2dadn%40googlegroups.com.
