Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> writes:

> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Noufal Ibrahim <nou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Am I the only one who thinks this is backward?
>
> No, definitely not. But you seem to be giving undue importance to this
> discussion by creating hypothetical scenarios.  I think, we can
> tolerate some mistakes and just stay focused.

Well, it did cause a long thread. I merely censured the OP for the
inappropriate post. I gather that most of you agree that it was not
suited for this list. So that's sorted. 

The teasing issue, a few people teased the company a little. I don't
think that was out of place. A little light hearted humour is, in my
opnion, a good thing. Apparently, you and Sriram disagree and that's
what spawned off this thread. 

This is getting too long for for my tastes. If there is a formal
statement on what's allowed on the list and what's not, I'll abide. I
personally don't like a strictly enforced code that keeps everyone
artificially super polite but like I said, I'll abide. 


-- 
~noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in

I distinctly remember forgetting that. -Clara Barton
_______________________________________________
BangPypers mailing list
BangPypers@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers

Reply via email to