Senthil Kumaran <sent...@uthcode.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Noufal Ibrahim <nou...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Am I the only one who thinks this is backward? > > No, definitely not. But you seem to be giving undue importance to this > discussion by creating hypothetical scenarios. I think, we can > tolerate some mistakes and just stay focused.
Well, it did cause a long thread. I merely censured the OP for the inappropriate post. I gather that most of you agree that it was not suited for this list. So that's sorted. The teasing issue, a few people teased the company a little. I don't think that was out of place. A little light hearted humour is, in my opnion, a good thing. Apparently, you and Sriram disagree and that's what spawned off this thread. This is getting too long for for my tastes. If there is a formal statement on what's allowed on the list and what's not, I'll abide. I personally don't like a strictly enforced code that keeps everyone artificially super polite but like I said, I'll abide. -- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in I distinctly remember forgetting that. -Clara Barton _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
