On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Vivek Khurana <hiddenharm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Dhananjay Nene > <dhananjay.n...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I've decided to go ahead with SQLAlchemy even though that was not my >> favourite. FWIW I'm just documenting my thoughts : >> >> Cons : Why I would've not preferred SQL Alchemy >> a. Dependency into a large full function package like sqlalchemy which just >> does a ton of stuff. I didn't need a ton of features .. just needed >> something basic. > > Â SQLAlchemy allows you to use only specific components. You can use db > abstraction while not using ORM at all. So, you still have the freedom > to use the basics that you need, while never bothering to learn the > advance stuff :)[..]
Are there any real harcode SQLAlchemy people here on the group? A talk on the ORM would be much appreciated I'm sure. -- ~noufal http://nibrahim.net.in _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
