On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Dhananjay Nene <dhananjay.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've decided to go ahead with SQLAlchemy even though that was not my > favourite. FWIW I'm just documenting my thoughts : > > Cons : Why I would've not preferred SQL Alchemy > a. Dependency into a large full function package like sqlalchemy which just > does a ton of stuff. I didn't need a ton of features .. just needed > something basic.
SQLAlchemy allows you to use only specific components. You can use db abstraction while not using ORM at all. So, you still have the freedom to use the basics that you need, while never bothering to learn the advance stuff :) regards Vivek -- The hidden harmony is better than the obvious!! _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
