On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:03 PM, Noufal Ibrahim <nou...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai > <abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > [..] > > Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good > > disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to > > a compiled language" - I fall flat there since I don't see any > > correlation with a language being compiled and its security! > [..] > > Security in this context meaning, I can distribute binary blobs of > code whose source you can't read. > That is obscurity, not security ;) > > -- > ~noufal > http://nibrahim.net.in > _______________________________________________ > BangPypers mailing list > BangPypers@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers > -- --Anand _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
