On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai <abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Roshan Mathews <rmath...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai >> <abpil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Upon 2nd reading, I also thought they did, but not a very good >> > disambiguation there I daresay. But "security benefits associated to >> > a compiled language" - I fall flat there since I don't see any >> > correlation with a language being compiled and its security! >> > >> > Pretty shoddy marketing this... >> > >> The Go people said this? Where are you quoting from? >> >> > Not sure if go people said this. But it is in the techcrunch link > posted by Sriram, in another thread, 1st paragraph. > > http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/10/google-go-language/ > > I didn't make it up :-)
Straight from the horse's mouth: http://golang.org/doc/go_lang_faq.html#creating_a_new_language _______________________________________________ BangPypers mailing list BangPypers@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/bangpypers
