Why don't you have a single machine name, i.e. sd.mydomain.it, but resolving to a different IP address depending on the network you're in?
Le 27 avril 2024 11:16:59 GMT+02:00, Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> a écrit : >Hello. > >I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new >problems to solve and using 15.x for the first time, so I'm not sure if I'm >doing things wrong or if Bacula is misbehaving. > > > > > >First problem: clients are spread across three different VLANS. >While I only have one storage daemon, listening on all interfaces, clients >will need to contact it through different addresses. >I.e. >_ clients in VLAN 1 need to use sd.a.mydomain.it; >_ clients in VLAN 2 need to use sd.b.mydomain.it; >_ clients in VLAN 3 need to use sd.c.mydomain.it. > >I found no way of doing this without declaring three "Storage" resources in >bacula-dir.conf. >Is this the best way to do this? Or are there better alternatives? > >As a consequence of the above, I declared three "Device"s in bacula-sd (since >this is an HD-based storage, I just made three different directories). >Again, is this the best way to do this? > >It's more or less working, but the SD will often hang with one "Device" or two >working and the third stuck (with clients on the affected VLAN all "waiting on >Storage xxxx"). >Is this a bug that I need to investigate or am I just using the SD in a way >that it's not supposed to work? > >Should I let three different SD run? >(This would somewhat complicate management, but I can't think of any stopper). > > > > > >Aside, I've always done backups in sequence (one at a time); alas the number >of clients and amount of data in this installation require that I start doing >them in parallel. > >If I understand correctly, doing multiple jobs in parallel on one SD means >that data from different clients will be interleaved in a single volume. >Is this correct? >Since I'd like to have one job per volume, is there any way to have a single >SD/device open multiple volumes at once? > >The above configuration (three Devices) allows me to do at least three jobs in >parallel (one per VLAN) without interleaving data. >However, is this supported or am I just asking for troubles? > > > > bye & Thanks > av. > > >_______________________________________________ >Bacula-users mailing list >Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users >
_______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
