https://www.bacula.org/7.0.x-manuals/en/main/New_Features_in_7_0_0.html

Best Regards

Pedro

Create your WiseStamp email signature
<https://www.wisestamp.com/lp/promo/professional-email-signature?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=>

[image: __tpx__]
‌


Pedro Oliveira <oliveira...@gmail.com> escreveu em sáb., 27/04/2024 às
10:24 :

> Please could you check the configuration directive fdstorageaddress in the
> client
>
> Create your WiseStamp email signature
> <https://www.wisestamp.com/lp/promo/professional-email-signature?utm_source=promotion&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=create_your_own&srcid=>
>
> [image: __tpx__]
> ‌
>
>
> Andrea Venturoli <m...@netfence.it> escreveu em sáb., 27/04/2024 às 10:21 :
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm deploying a completely new installation and I'm both facing some new
>> problems to solve and using 15.x for the first time, so I'm not sure if
>> I'm doing things wrong or if Bacula is misbehaving.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> First problem: clients are spread across three different VLANS.
>> While I only have one storage daemon, listening on all interfaces,
>> clients will need to contact it through different addresses.
>> I.e.
>> _ clients in VLAN 1 need to use sd.a.mydomain.it;
>> _ clients in VLAN 2 need to use sd.b.mydomain.it;
>> _ clients in VLAN 3 need to use sd.c.mydomain.it.
>>
>> I found no way of doing this without declaring three "Storage" resources
>> in bacula-dir.conf.
>> Is this the best way to do this? Or are there better alternatives?
>>
>> As a consequence of the above, I declared three "Device"s in bacula-sd
>> (since this is an HD-based storage, I just made three different
>> directories).
>> Again, is this the best way to do this?
>>
>> It's more or less working, but the SD will often hang with one "Device"
>> or two working and the third stuck (with clients on the affected VLAN
>> all "waiting on Storage xxxx").
>> Is this a bug that I need to investigate or am I just using the SD in a
>> way that it's not supposed to work?
>>
>> Should I let three different SD run?
>> (This would somewhat complicate management, but I can't think of any
>> stopper).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Aside, I've always done backups in sequence (one at a time); alas the
>> number of clients and amount of data in this installation require that I
>> start doing them in parallel.
>>
>> If I understand correctly, doing multiple jobs in parallel on one SD
>> means that data from different clients will be interleaved in a single
>> volume.
>> Is this correct?
>> Since I'd like to have one job per volume, is there any way to have a
>> single SD/device open multiple volumes at once?
>>
>> The above configuration (three Devices) allows me to do at least three
>> jobs in parallel (one per VLAN) without interleaving data.
>> However, is this supported or am I just asking for troubles?
>>
>>
>>
>>   bye & Thanks
>>         av.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bacula-users mailing list
>> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Reply via email to