Hi, Can we achieve this separate pool configuration, or multiple device storage in BACULA ENTERPRISE without any performance issues.
I want maximum throughput may be for a 3000 vm's and each vm should have their backup separated. They must be able to see their individual backups and do what ever they want. Regards, Muhasin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kern Sibbald" <k...@sibbald.com> To: muha...@assistanz.com, "Dimitri Maziuk" <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> Cc: "bacula-users" <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 2:38:01 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs are writing to wrong volumes. Hello, There is no limitation on the number of Pools in Bacula, but the code was written assuming a relatively small number of Pools (probably less than say 10,000). Consequently when you use more Pools, you may find at some point, probably well beyond what you are planning, that the Pool access algorithms need to be adjusted. This was for example a problem with having a huge number of Jobs (e.g. more than several thousand). For Jobs, I rewrote the algorithms for accessing Job resources a number of years ago, which essentially eliminates the performance problems with the old linear algorithms. Best regards, Kern On 19/08/2017 07:59, muha...@assistanz.com wrote: > Hi, > > Now I have planned to use dedicated pool for each job, i think this will not > create a problem. Creating a total of 1000+ pools will create a problem in > bacula?. I do not see any limitations for number of pools creation in any doc. > > > > Regards, > > Muhasin C.M > Systems Engineer R & D > Assistanz Networks Pvt LTD > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dimitri Maziuk" <dmaz...@bmrb.wisc.edu> > To: "bacula-users" <bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Friday, August 18, 2017 11:04:37 PM > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Jobs are writing to wrong volumes. > > On 08/18/2017 07:13 AM, muha...@assistanz.com wrote: >> Helo Heitor, >> >>> "Use Volume Once" is an explicitly non-recommended directive by Kern >>> himself. You should use "Maximum Volume Jobs=1" in the pool resource. >> Thank You for the above change,and this means only one job will run in that >> pool?. > I believe so. A "volume" is a tape in a tape drive, if you want to write > 50 "volumes" at once you need 50 "drives" -- devices. > >>> Another way, if you want different backup jobs to ALWAYS write in different >>> sets of volumes, is scheduling them to different pools. >> so instead of device we should maintain pools for all new backup jobs. Will >> the increase in number of pools will not be an another problem, like 50 >> pools for 50 jobs. > I've hard time imagining a scenario in which that would be useful. > > I'm assuming you're backing up to disk, not to actual tapes. You may be > able to get somewhere by spooling jobs (we use SSDs here), with a large > enough spool drive you could potentially spool all 50 jobs in parallel. > If you have bacula auto-create volumes, you may be able to get job id > into volume label somehow... > -- Muhasin C.M Systems Engineer R & D Assistanz Networks Pvt LTD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users